Is Creatine worthless? | New Research Analysis

Have you heard? Creatine’s superstar status in the supplement world just took a potential hit. A new study suggests those muscle gains you’ve been attributing to your daily creatine might be nothing more than your muscles holding water. But before you toss your tub in the trash, let’s dig into what’s really happening when that white powder enters your system.

The Study That Shook the Fitness World

Picture this: 63 healthy adults, half taking creatine and half taking a placebo, all lifting weights for 12 weeks straight. Both groups gained about 1.8 kg of muscle. The kicker? It didn’t seem to matter whether they were taking creatine or not.

Researchers at the University of New South Wales found that the only measurable difference was during the first week—the creatine group gained about 0.45 kg of “lean mass” that researchers attributed to water retention. After that? The playing field leveled completely.

If this were the only study on creatine, we’d be having a very different conversation right now. But here’s where it gets interesting…

Why One Study Doesn’t Tell the Whole Story

Imagine judging a football player’s ability based on watching a single match. During that one game, they might be recovering from an injury, facing an exceptionally strong opponent, or simply having an off day. No sports analyst would ever evaluate a player’s true skill level from such limited data.

Science works the same way. A single study is like that one match—a snapshot taken under specific conditions with a particular group of participants. The real picture emerges when we examine performance across an entire season—or in scientific terms, across multiple studies with different methodologies, populations, and research teams.

The more data points we collect, the clearer the pattern becomes, and the less likely we are to be misled by random variation or methodological quirks in any single investigation.

The Plot Thickens: What Other Research Shows

When we zoom out to examine the entire body of creatine research, a more nuanced story emerges:

Creatine Without Training: Yes, It’s Mostly Water

Taking creatine while sitting on your couch? You’ll gain about 0.9 kg of “mass” in a week that disappears when you stop taking it. This is uncontroversial—it’s water weight, plain and simple.

Creatine + Training: That’s Where the Magic Happens

Here’s where the scientific plot thickens:

• Multiple studies show creatine users gaining 0.9-1.8 kg of extra muscle over 8-12 weeks compared to their sweating, lifting, but creatine-free counterparts
• Advanced techniques like muscle biopsies, MRI, and ultrasound (which can distinguish water from actual muscle tissue) confirm these findings
• One particularly telling study showed trained muscles growing 7.1% with creatine versus just 1.6% without it
• “Wash-out” studies (where participants stop taking creatine and lose the water weight) show that much of the gained size persists

The Strength Factor: Water Doesn’t Make You Stronger

Perhaps the most compelling evidence is something water can’t fake: strength gains. Water might make muscles look bigger in the mirror, but it won’t help you lift heavier weights. Yet study after study shows creatine users getting significantly stronger than their placebo-taking twins.

Unless water has suddenly developed the ability to build contractile proteins, something more is happening beneath the surface.

The Biological Blueprint: How Creatine Actually Works

The case for creatine gets even stronger when we peek under the hood at what’s happening at the cellular level:

1. Your Workouts Get Supercharged: With creatine, you squeeze out more reps, maintain quality across more sets, and push closer to failure. More quality volume = more muscle growth. This alone could explain everything.

2. Swollen Cells Signal Growth: That initial water influx isn’t just cosmetic—it triggers anabolic signaling pathways. Your cells essentially think: “We’re expanding; better build more infrastructure to support this growth!”

3. More Muscle Command Centers: Creatine significantly increases muscle fiber nuclei—the cellular command centers that orchestrate protein synthesis. More commanders = more building capacity.

4. Less Growth Restriction: Remember those incredible “myostatin knockout” animals with absurd muscle mass? Creatine modestly reduces myostatin expression, essentially loosening the natural limits on your muscle development.

One mechanism might be coincidence. Four aligned mechanisms suggest we’re observing a real phenomenon.

When Studies Collide: Why Findings Sometimes Differ

So why might this new study contradict the broader research landscape? Three possibilities stand out:

1. The Signal-to-Noise Problem: Creatine’s effect, while real, is relatively modest. When measuring something small against the background of natural variation, sometimes the signal gets lost in the noise—especially with smaller sample sizes.

2. Measurement Limitations: Sometimes the effect of creatine is smaller than the margin of error in measurement techniques. It’s like trying to measure millimeters with a ruler marked only in centimeters.

3. The Individual Response Spectrum: Some people experience dramatic results from creatine; others barely respond at all. A study might inadvertently recruit mostly non-responders, skewing the results.

What This Means for Your Supplement Regimen

With all this evidence in mind, here’s the practical takeaway:

1. Creatine Works—But Subtly: The weight of scientific evidence suggests creatine enhances actual muscle growth beyond water retention, but don’t expect miracles.

2. It’s Not a Shortcut: The effect is modest compared to fundamentals like progressive overload, adequate protein, and sufficient recovery. Think of it as optimizing an already-solid approach, not a shortcut.

3. Your Mileage May Vary: Like that friend who gets buzzed from half a beer while others can drink all night, your personal response to creatine depends partly on your unique physiology.

4. Risk-Reward Favors Taking It: Given its safety profile, low cost, and evidence for effectiveness, creatine remains one of the few supplements worth considering for serious trainees.

The Final Rep

Science is rarely black and white, especially when studying complex biological systems. One study finding no effect doesn’t invalidate dozens showing benefits, just as one rainy day doesn’t disprove climate change.

For now, the scientific consensus remains: creatine likely contributes to real muscle development, though in a modest way that might sometimes fall below the detection threshold of individual studies.

So keep that creatine in your shaker cup—just pair it with realistic expectations and the understanding that no supplement replaces the fundamentals of effective training, nutrition, and recovery.

---

This blog post reflects current scientific understanding as of April 2025. Always consult healthcare professionals before beginning any supplementation program.

About the Author

Payman Supervizer is a serial entrepreneur and technology expert with a lifelong interest in fitness and athletic performance. With a diverse background spanning cybersecurity, artificial intelligence, and quantum computing, Payman brings an analytical, evidence-based approach to every subject he explores. His athletic background includes competitive basketball and football in his youth, giving him firsthand experience with training and performance optimization. Through “The Supervizer” podcast and his personal blog, Payman examines the intersection of technology, science, and human performance, cutting through marketing hype to deliver practical insights.

References

1. Hagstrom, A.D.; Yao, F.; Kim, J.E.; Baek, S.; Wang, P.; Lee, A.; Li, Y.; Lin, G.; Sullivan, J.; McGovern, A.; et al. (2023). “The Effect of Creatine Supplementation on Lean Body Mass with and Without Resistance Training.” Nutrients, 17(6), 1081. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/17/6/1081

2. Volek, J.S.; Duncan, N.D.; Mazzetti, S.A.; Staron, R.S.; Putukian, M.; Gómez, A.L.; Pearson, D.R.; Fink, W.J.; Kraemer, W.J. (1999). “Performance and muscle fiber adaptations to creatine supplementation and heavy resistance training.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 31(8), 1147-1156. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10449017/

3. Chrusch, M.J.; Chilibeck, P.D.; Chad, K.E.; Davison, K.S.; Burke, D.G. (2001). “Creatine supplementation combined with resistance training in older men.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 33(12), 2111-2117. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11740307/

4. Olsen, S.; Aagaard, P.; Kadi, F.; Tufekovic, G.; Verney, J.; Olesen, J.L.; Suetta, C.; Kjaer, M. (2006). “Creatine supplementation augments the increase in satellite cell and myonuclei number in human skeletal muscle induced by strength training.” The Journal of Physiology, 573(Pt 2), 525-534. https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1779717/

5. Antonio, J.; Candow, D.G.; Forbes, S.C.; Gualano, B.; Jagim, A.R.; Kreider, R.B.; Rawson, E.S.; Smith-Ryan, A.E.; VanDusseldorp, T.A.; Willoughby, D.S.; Ziegenfuss, T.N. (2021). “Effects of Creatine Supplementation during Resistance Training Sessions in Physically Active Young Adults.” Nutrients, 12(6), 1880. https://www.mdpi.com/2072-6643/12/6/1880

6. Kreider, R.B.; Kalman, D.S.; Antonio, J.; Ziegenfuss, T.N.; Wildman, R.; Collins, R.; Candow, D.G.; Kleiner, S.M.; Almada, A.L.; Lopez, H.L. (2017). “Common questions and misconceptions about creatine supplementation: what does the scientific evidence really show?” Journal of the International Society of Sports Nutrition, 14, 18. https://jissn.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12970-021-00412-w

7. Saremi, A.; Gharakhanloo, R.; Sharghi, S.; Gharaati, M.R.; Larijani, B.; Omidfar, K. (2010). “Effects of oral creatine and resistance training on serum myostatin and GASP-1.” Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology, 317(1-2), 25-30. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20026378/